<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Marketing Chick Diary &#187; Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.marketingchick.com/category/spam/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.marketingchick.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts and observations as I work on my business and find new ideas to increase my profits... as well as the occasional off-topic ramblings by me, Carmen Sakurai, "The Marketing Chick."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>An Interview With A Spammer</title>
		<link>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/an-interview-with-a-spammer</link>
		<comments>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/an-interview-with-a-spammer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking Out Loud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.marketingchick.com/an-interview-with-a-spammer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike, an average Joe-spammer, made an average of $40,000 per month sending spam to millions of inboxes between 1997 to 2000. However, due to the ISP&#8217;s aggressive anti-spam filtering systems, he admits, &#8220;spamming just isn&#8217;t paying the bills like it used to&#8230; it&#8217;s no longer easy money. We are throwing in the towel&#8221; But check [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, an average Joe-spammer, made an <strong>average of $40,000 per month</strong> sending spam to millions of inboxes between 1997 to 2000.  </p>
<p>However, due to the ISP&#8217;s aggressive anti-spam filtering systems, he admits, &#8220;spamming just isn&#8217;t paying the bills like it used to&#8230; it&#8217;s no longer easy money. We are throwing in the towel&#8221;</p>
<p>But check out this statement:</p>
<blockquote><div><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20051121/tc_pcworld/123597">Spam Slayer: Meet Average-Joe Spammer</a></div>
<p>
If nobody was really interested in spam and never bought anything that was advertised to them, spam would go away. But people are interested in spam. <strong>As long as people buy things advertised in spam then people like me will send bulk e-mail.</strong> Are we really that different from so-called legitimate bulk e-mailers? I don&#8217;t think there is a whole lot of difference.</p></blockquote>
<p>I find it interesting that spammers like Mike are losing money and giving up this &#8220;source of income&#8221; not as a result of of CAN-SPAM laws, or people who have been educated to fight and stay clear of spam&#8230; but because of one of the biggest annoyances to <strong>legitimate ezine publishers</strong> like myself&#8230; the ISP&#8217;s e-mail filtering system.</p>
<p><em>I have mixed feelings.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/an-interview-with-a-spammer/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coolest Guy on the Planet Claims Blog Comment Spam Works!</title>
		<link>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/coolest-guy-on-the-planet-claims-blog-comment-spam-works</link>
		<comments>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/coolest-guy-on-the-planet-claims-blog-comment-spam-works#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging &#038; RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.marketingchick.com/coolest-guy-on-the-planet-claims-blog-comment-spam-works</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or so the many endorsement e-mails are trying to convince me&#8230; Yes, they all seem to support the blog comment spam software I talked about a few days ago. One of the &#8220;selling points&#8221;&#8230; on the sales page &#38; endorsement e-mails is a search for a particular keyword phrase on Yahoo.com that returns a site [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or so the many endorsement e-mails are trying to convince me&#8230; Yes, they all seem to support the <a href="http://blog.marketingchick.com/comment_spam_software_endorsed_by_a_marketing_biggie.shtml">blog comment spam software</a> I talked about a few days ago.</p>
<h2>One of the &#8220;selling points&#8221;&#8230;</h2>
<p>on the sales page &amp; endorsement e-mails is a search for a particular keyword phrase on Yahoo.com that returns a site still &#8220;Under Construction&#8221; ranked at the #1 spot.</p>
<p>The claim is&#8230; thanks to this super neat blog spam software, even a &#8220;blank&#8221; site was able to secure a #1 ranking on Yahoo for this competitive keyword phrase.  And if it can do this for an empty site, imagine what it can do for your content-rich page!</p>
<h2>Previous Occupants&#8230;</h2>
<p>Sure the site is &#8216;blank&#8217; <em>at the moment</em>&#8230; but they forgot to mention that from as far back as March 2004, this site was a fully functional <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20040623014957/http://catfurniturediscounters.com/">discount cat furniture store</a> with some <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20040622115435/www.catfurniturediscounters.com/links.htm">serious reciprocal link exchange marketing</a>!</p>
<p>So this isn&#8217;t exactly a brand new website, still under construction, and never promoted on the Internet&#8230; it was actually a full-blown online store with extensive, content-relevant, link exchanges already in place.</p>
<p>The blog spam sales site even gives you a link to check out some of their backlinks, and you&#8217;ll find about 381 backlinks coming from blogger.com blogs.  </p>
<p><i>This particular backlink search specifically looks for links coming from blogspot.com websites only, because this spam software will post only to blogger.com blogs (<a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.catfurniturediscounters.com+site%3Ablogspot.com&amp;sm=Yahoo%21+Search&amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;toggle=1&amp;cop=&amp;ei=UTF-8">see here</a>).</i></p>
<p><strong>But&#8230;</strong> if you remove the <em>blogspot.com filter</em> from that backlink search, you&#8217;ll see that the site has a <a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.catfurniturediscounters.com&amp;prssweb=Search&amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;fl=1&amp;vc=&amp;vl=lang_en&amp;x=wrt&amp;meta=0">total of over 880 backlinks</a>.</p>
<h2>That&#8217;s 500+ extra backlinks&#8230;</h2>
<p>from non-blogger.com websites.  So, where are they coming from?  Why, reciprocal link exchanges with pet-related sites and other link exchange directories, of course!  Obviously, the blog spam software was not responsible for these reciprocal link exchanges.</p>
<p>Does it still look like this blog spam software brought this &#8216;blank&#8217; site to #1?</p>
<p><em>Personally, it looks more to me like they used <a href="http://www.marketingchick.com/seoelite.php">Brad Callen&#8217;s SEO Elite Software</a> to simplify finding &amp; exchanging a massive number of reciprocal links to get to #1&#8230; but that&#8217;s just my opinion. (And yes, that&#8217;s an affiliate link.)</em></p>
<h2>Some people *want* to be spammed?</h2>
<p><a id="more-182"></a><br />
It&#8217;s so incredibly annoying how those promoting this software keep insisting that if blogger.com account holders *did not* want to receive comment spam, they would enable the word-verification option, as well as all other preventative measures, when accepting comments.  And if they fail to &#8220;lock and guard all their doors&#8221; it could only mean they welcome automated comments with open arms.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s like saying if you really don&#8217;t want to receive e-mail spam, you&#8217;ll take advantage of every spam filtering method and tool available today&#8230; and if you don&#8217;t, what you&#8217;re really saying is you actually enjoy receiving the spam that slips through the filters.</p>
<h2>Your family is falling apart?  Great!  You&#8217;ll love my horse breeding site!</h2>
<p>As I was researching some of the generic comments posted by this software, I came across a blog post by a young man talking about how depressed he was that his parents have decided to get a divorce.  &#8220;Nothing matters to me anymore&#8230;&#8221; &#8220;I might have to get back on antidepressants&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>And the first three (3) comments&#8230;</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Great topic! I&#8217;ll definitely bookmark your site!  I&#8217;ve got a *horse breeding* site. It&#8217;s mostly on horse breeding.  Check it out if you&#8217;re not too busy!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Hey you have a knack for writing &#8211; keep up the good work! I&#8217;ve bookmarked your site!  I have an *online poker* site. I know it&#8217;s off-topic since it&#8217;s about online poker information, but check it out if you&#8217;re not too busy  <img src='http://blog.marketingchick.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Great blog!  I&#8217;m definitely going to bookmark you!  I have an *affiliate marketing* site covering everything related to affiliate marketing!  Come visit when you get a chance!&#8221;</em></p>
<h2>Equivalent to article marketing &amp; forum posting?</h2>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen some well respected marketers compare blog comment spamming to article marketing and forum posting.  </p>
<p>Articles are voluntarily added to a website by the webmaster, giving the article author a backlink.  Win-win: Webmaster gets free content and author gets free publicity.</p>
<p>Forums usually don&#8217;t allow blatant advertising, but (usually) allow a short sig file at the end of your post.  Win-win: Forum owner gets traffic and active discussions while forum member gets to network and receive a free backlink.</p>
<h2>We&#8217;re doing the bloggers a favor by keeping their blogs active&#8230;</h2>
<p>Blog comment spamming on the other hand benefits only the spammer.  Majority of bloggers want REAL people to come visit their site and read their posts.  However, since comment posting is automated with this software, the blogger doesn&#8217;t get a *live* visit to their blog, nor are their posts read.  But at least the spammers gets hundreds of backlinks, right?  <em>So, who&#8217;s doing who a favor?</em></p>
<h2>It&#8217;s The New &#8220;Free For All Links&#8221; Blasting&#8230;</h2>
<p>Remember those FFA pages where you went to post your link with a one-line description of your site?  As new links were added to the FFA links page, the older links were dropped&#8230; webmaster received lots of traffic from people posting and reposting their links&#8230; and link posters got some free exposure.</p>
<p>Remember when FFA Link blasters became popular?  Link posters no longer needed to visit these individual FFA pages anymore&#8230; they only had to fill in their URL and a short description into their blaster once, and their information was posted to hundreds of FFA link pages without having to visit them.</p>
<p>Webmasters stopped getting visits&#8230; but at least the spammers got hundreds of backlinks, right?  <em>So, who&#8217;s doing who a favor?</em></p>
<p>Wow&#8230; deja vu!</p>
<h2>If you insist on using this piece of software&#8230;</h2>
<p>get 50 of your friends together and each of you agree to maintain 5 blogger.com blogs where you&#8217;ll post an article every few days.  Enter the URLs of only those 250 blogs into the software, and spam each other!  This will truly be a win-win x 50&#8230; and you can be certain you won&#8217;t be annoying anyone with your random and generic garbage.</p>
<p><i>Screenshot of comment spam posted on a movie producer&#8217;s blog&#8230; unfortunately, he&#8217;s not able to moderate the comments or turn on the word verification option because he was recently killed in a car accident&#8230; yet the spam keeps on coming.</i></p>
<p><img src="http://blog.marketingchick.com/blogspam.jpg" width="427"></p>
<h2>Final thoughts:</h2>
<p>Blogs are just that&#8230; web logs, online diaries, and journals.  It&#8217;s a form of communication and that itself must be respected.  Maintaining a blog solely to link back to your website or post articles for SEO purposes does not give you permission to disrespect the majority of blogs that exist specifically to deliver a personal or corporate message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/coolest-guy-on-the-planet-claims-blog-comment-spam-works/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comment Spam Software Endorsed by a Marketing Biggie</title>
		<link>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/comment-spam-software-endorsed-by-a-marketing-biggie</link>
		<comments>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/comment-spam-software-endorsed-by-a-marketing-biggie#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2005 02:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging &#038; RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.marketingchick.com/comment-spam-software-endorsed-by-a-marketing-biggie</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While catching up on e-mails this afternoon, I noticed an endorsement from a pretty well-respected marketer promoting none other than&#8230; a comment spamming software. What this software does is automatically post random &#8220;generic&#8221; comments (which includes a link back to your site with keyword anchor texts) on various blogs, in an effort to rank higher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While catching up on e-mails this afternoon, I noticed an endorsement from a pretty well-respected marketer promoting none other than&#8230; a comment spamming software.</p>
<p>What this software does is automatically post random &#8220;generic&#8221; comments (which includes a link back to your site with keyword anchor texts) on various blogs, in an effort to rank higher in search engines.</p>
<p>If you have a blog with comments enabled, you&#8217;ve most likely received fake comments similar to this one:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Great blog with interesting posts!</p>
<p>When you get a chance, come check out my &lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.####.com&#8221;&gt;##Keyword Anchor Text##&lt;/a&gt; website!  I&#8217;ve got lots of ##Keyword Text## information there!&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The site promoting this software actually states that Blogger.com is aware of, and *condones* automated comment spamming, and &#8216;backs this up&#8217; by pointing out Blogger.com&#8217;s word-verification option when accepting comments.  They claim that <em>this option would not be offered if they were opposed to automated comment posting.</em></p>
<p>What the FORK?!!  From where I&#8217;m sitting (screenshots from the Blogger.com account area below), it looks more to me like Blogger.com offers this option as an <strong>additional measure</strong> to <em><u>preventing</u></em> comment spam&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.marketingchick.com/blog/images/blogger-spam.jpg" width="450" height="78"></p>
<p>Yup, even ones posted by those &#8216;clever&#8217; automated software:<br />
<img src="http://www.marketingchick.com/blog/images/blogger-spam2.jpg" width="418" height="426"></p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t look too much like they&#8217;re all that supportive of comment spamming and automated software posting now, does it?</p>
<p><em>If you must resort to this method of &#8216;promotion&#8217;, I suggest you start your own blog and comment spam only yourself, instead of taking up other people&#8217;s space.</em></p>
<p>Please note that many bloggers utilize a <a href="http://www.jayallen.org/comment_spam/">shared blacklist</a>, and posting these types of generic comments, in hopes that your site will be ranked higher in search engines, can get your URL, e-mail address, and IP address blacklisted, and blocked from further posting to many, many, many blogs&#8230; including mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/comment-spam-software-endorsed-by-a-marketing-biggie/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eliminating Trackback Ping Spam</title>
		<link>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/eliminating-trackback-ping-spam</link>
		<comments>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/eliminating-trackback-ping-spam#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 23:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging &#038; RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.marketingchick.com/eliminating-trackback-ping-spam</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve noticed I haven&#8217;t received ANY trackback spam notices in the past week! All thanks to Brad Choate &#38; Tobias Hoellrich&#8217;s FREE SpamLookup plugin&#8230; quick &#38; easy install, and most importantly, this bad boy works!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed I haven&#8217;t received ANY trackback spam notices in the past week!  All thanks to Brad Choate &amp; Tobias Hoellrich&#8217;s FREE <a href="http://bradchoate.com/projects/spamlookup/">SpamLookup</a> plugin&#8230; quick &amp; easy install, and most importantly, this bad boy works!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/eliminating-trackback-ping-spam/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spam &amp; Virus Proofing MS Office Outlook</title>
		<link>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/spam-virus-proofing-ms-office-outlook</link>
		<comments>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/spam-virus-proofing-ms-office-outlook#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 00:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers / Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software &#038; Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.marketingchick.com/spam-virus-proofing-ms-office-outlook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Outlook being a flamin&#8217; red target for viruses&#8230; and the horror stories I&#8217;ve heard of all the grief it has caused, I&#8217;ve never ever considered using this e-mail program. Are you nuts?! I cry over burnt brownies&#8230; how would I ever recover from a virus attack? But curiosity finally got the best of me, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Outlook being a flamin&#8217; red target for viruses&#8230; and the horror stories I&#8217;ve heard of all the grief it has caused, I&#8217;ve never ever considered using this e-mail program.  Are you nuts?!  I cry over burnt brownies&#8230; how would I ever recover from a virus attack?</p>
<p>But curiosity finally got the best of me, especially after seeing how well it works with other Office applications, and its ability to integrate the <a href="http://www.tkqlhce.com/click-1611208-10368617">Stamps.com</a> software for easy postage printing.</p>
<p>Okay, so I&#8217;m hooked.  But I <u>am</u> taking proper precautions to avoid making a big ole yucky mess all over my pretty computer.</p>
<p>Now, although Outlook has powerful message filters, it only uses black and white lists, so the junk mail filters cannot be trained.  Fortunately, I found a FREE solution to this weakness in <a href="http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/"><strong>SpamBayes</strong></a>.  This is a FREE plugin for Outlook that you can train to classify incoming messages as spam, unsure, or non-spam.  The messages are then automatically filed away in the appropriate folder.</p>
<p>To keep those slimy viruses and other disgusting stuff away, I&#8217;ve selected to send all mail in plain text, as well as receive and display all mail in plain text without downloading remote images in e-mails from unknown senders.</p>
<p>Sure, HTML messages are pretty, but I&#8217;ll stick with Millie Vanilla plain text if it&#8217;ll keep me from catching anything.</p>
<p>Use these tips, and you too can be on your way to a safer, more secure e-mail experience!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/spam-virus-proofing-ms-office-outlook/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attention Spam Arrest Users&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/attention-spam-arrest-users</link>
		<comments>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/attention-spam-arrest-users#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.marketingchick.com/attention-spam-arrest-users</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Myers posted the sender agreement found on the Spam Arrest sender verification page to the Warriors forum&#8230; seems he has a little problem with it. Take a look: SpamArrest.com SENDER AGREEMENT &#8211; By clicking the &#8220;VERIFY&#8221; button above, and in consideration for Spam Arrest, LLC forwarding your e-mail (and any e-mails you may send [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.talkbiz.net/ramblings/weblog.php">Paul Myers</a> posted the sender agreement found on the Spam Arrest sender verification page to the Warriors forum&#8230; seems he has a little problem with it.  Take a look:</p>
<blockquote><div><a href="http://spamarrest.com/affl?233836">SpamArrest.com</a></div>
<p>SENDER AGREEMENT &#8211; By clicking the &#8220;VERIFY&#8221; button above, and in consideration for Spam Arrest, LLC forwarding your e-mail (and any e-mails you may send in the future) to the intended recipient (the &#8220;Recipient&#8221;), you agree to be bound by the following Sender Agreement:</p>
<p>You represent and warrant to Spam Arrest and the Recipient that any e-mail you desire to send to the Recipient is not &#8220;unsolicited commercial e-mail&#8221; i.e., <strong>the e-mail does not primarily contain an advertisement or promotion of a commercial product, service or Web site</strong>; unless the Recipient expressly consented to receive the message, either in response to a clear and conspicuous request for such consent or at the Recipient&#8217;s own initiative. Further, you represent and warrant that your transmission of any e-mail does not violate any local, state or federal law governing the transmission of unsolicited commercial e-mail, including, but not limited to, RCW § 19.190.020 or the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. You understand and acknowledge that it is fair and reasonable that you agree to abide by the restrictions set forth in this agreement. You acknowledge and agree that this agreement is central to Spam Arrest&#8217;s decision to forward your e-mails to the Recipient. Accordingly, if you violate this agreement, <strong>Spam Arrest and the Recipient shall be entitled to (1) temporary and/or permanent injunctive relief to restrain any further breaches or violations of this agreement; and (2) damages in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) for each violation of this agreement.</strong>  You acknowledge that such remedies are appropriate and reasonable in light of the costs and expenses Spam Arrest incurs as a result of eradicating and filtering unsolicited commercial e-mail. You acknowledge that the $2000.00 remedy is a reasonable estimate of Spam Arrest&#8217;s and the Recipient&#8217;s actual damages. This agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Washington and the exclusive venue for any action related to this agreement shall be held in the state and federal courts located in Washington. <strong>You hereby waive any right to object to venue or jurisdiction based on inconvenient forum, lack of personal jurisdiction or for any other reason.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>If you are a SpamArrest user and subscribe to a mailing list/ezine/newsletter whatever&#8230; <u>be sure to whitelist the list&#8217;s mailing address</u>.  (Go into your &#8216;unverified&#8217; folder and authorize any subscription confirmation messages yourself.)</p>
<p>I agree with Paul.  List owners who verify are basically setting themselves up to get shot in the butt by people who use this service, while making it a habit to cry &#8220;Spam!&#8221; just to cause trouble&#8230; or <a href="http://www.marketingchick.com/quickies/2005/01/index.html#000236">don&#8217;t know how to unsubscribe from lists they&#8217;ve subscribed to</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a satisfied SpamArrest user, but no way am I gonna verify myself for those who have subscribed to my ezine.  <strong>If you&#8217;re going to subscribe to a list, learn to use the whitelist!</strong></p>
<p>    function launchAnim() {<br />
        var awin = window.open(&#8216;http://spamarrest.com/howitworks/demo.jsp?affiliate=233836&#8242;,&#8217;anim&#8217;,'height=250,width=475,scrollbars=0&#8242;);<br />
        if (window.focus) {<br />
            awin.focus();<br />
        }<br />
        return false;<br />
    }<br />
<a href='http://spamarrest.com/howitworks/demo.jsp?affiliate=233836'><img src='spamarrest.gif' height='60' width='324' border='0'></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/attention-spam-arrest-users/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spam Arrest = Ego Squasher</title>
		<link>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/spam-arrest-ego-squasher</link>
		<comments>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/spam-arrest-ego-squasher#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.marketingchick.com/spam-arrest-ego-squasher</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not even funny. I used to receive hundreds of e-mails each and every day. Granted, most of them were spam, but, it made me feel popular. Since I&#8217;ve started using Spam Arrest, I&#8217;m only receiving a maximum of 30 pieces of e-mail per day. No spam authorized so far, and legitimate senders seem [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not even funny.</p>
<p>I used to receive hundreds of e-mails each and every day.  Granted, most of them were spam, but, it made me feel popular.</p>
<p>Since I&#8217;ve started using <a href="http://www.marketingchick.com/spamarrest">Spam Arrest</a>, I&#8217;m only receiving a maximum of 30 pieces of e-mail per day.  No spam authorized so far, and legitimate senders seem to authorize themselves pretty quickly.</p>
<p>But the number is still the same.</p>
<p>Thirty.</p>
<p>I no longer feel like a Homecoming Queen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2005/spam-arrest-ego-squasher/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comment Spam Decrease</title>
		<link>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2004/comment-spam-decrease</link>
		<comments>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2004/comment-spam-decrease#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging &#038; RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.marketingchick.com/comment-spam-decrease</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I appreciate the fact that I&#8217;m no longer greeted with a list of 20+ new comments with nothing but links to cialis and viagra&#8230; posted to entries from months back. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m very happy with my decision to upgrade to Movable Type 3. MT allows you to &#8216;moderate&#8217; comments from users who do not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the fact that I&#8217;m no longer greeted with a list of 20+ new comments with nothing but links to cialis and viagra&#8230; posted to entries from months back.  That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m very happy with my decision to upgrade to <a href="http://www.movabletype.org">Movable Type 3.</a></p>
<p>MT allows you to &#8216;moderate&#8217; comments from users who do not have a free <a href="https://www.typekey.com">TypeKey</a> profile, comments to old entries, completely disallow comments from unregistered visitors, and more.  Your choice.  Plus, with Jay Allen&#8217;s <a href="http://www.jayallen.org/comment_spam/">MT-Blacklist</a> to filter out spammy URLs and IP addresses&#8230; blogging is a much more pleasant activity <img src='http://blog.marketingchick.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2004/comment-spam-decrease/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HOW DO YOU BLOCK THIS PEN*S SPAM?</title>
		<link>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2003/how-do-you-block-this-pens-spam</link>
		<comments>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2003/how-do-you-block-this-pens-spam#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.marketingchick.com/how-do-you-block-this-pens-spam</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tell me I&#8217;m not the only one repeatedly getting this same exact spam: &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- X-Originating-IP: [66.131.144.80] From: &#8220;Claude P. Land&#8221; To: Subject: Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:24:12 +0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 The only solution to Pen*s Enlargement LIMITED OFFER: Add at least 3 INCHES or get your money back! We are so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell me I&#8217;m not the only one repeatedly getting this same exact spam:</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
<font face="courier new, courier" size="3"><br />
X-Originating-IP: [66.131.144.80]<br />
From: &#8220;Claude P. Land&#8221;<br />
To:<br />
Subject:<br />
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:24:12 +0000<br />
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158</font></p>
<p><B><font size="4" face="verdana">The only solution to Pen*s Enlargement</B></font></p>
<p><font size="4"><b><font color="#ff0000">LIMITED OFFER:</font></b> Add at least 3 INCHES<br />
or get your money back!</b></font></p>
<p>We are so sure our product works we are willing to prove it by offering a <b>free trial bottle </b>+ a 100% <b> money back guarantee</b> upon purchase if you are not satisfied with the results.  </p>
<p><b><font size="4">&#8212;&gt; Click Here To Learn More</font> </b></p>
<p><font size="3">Also check out our <b>*brand new*</b> product: Pen*s Erection Oil</font><br />
<b>Comes with the 100% money back warranty as well!</b><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t even filter it out because they put randam characters in brackets (ie. &lt;SJIOFPDSJKLDFOIJS&gt;) within the words in the message.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s so incredibly annoying having to download *at least* 20 copies of this same message every single day.  I *SWEAR*, I don&#8217;t have this particular body part, so quit sending these to me!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2003/how-do-you-block-this-pens-spam/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Kumar selling e-mail addies?</title>
		<link>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2003/joe-kumar-selling-e-mail-addies</link>
		<comments>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2003/joe-kumar-selling-e-mail-addies#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 19:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.marketingchick.com/joe-kumar-selling-e-mail-addies</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to let you know. If you&#8217;re considering to buy a database of e-mail addresses, don&#8217;t do it. Unless it&#8217;s a service like Marty Foley&#8217;s &#8220;Lead Factory&#8221; where subscribers voluntarily opt-in to your publication at their own will, it&#8217;s very likely you&#8217;ll receive a ton of spam complaints&#8230; get shut down by your web host&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let you know.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re considering to buy a database of e-mail addresses, don&#8217;t do it.</p>
<p>Unless it&#8217;s a service like Marty Foley&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://profitinfo.com/cgi-bin/lb.cgi?PI2331">Lead Factory</a>&#8221; where subscribers voluntarily opt-in to your publication at their own will, it&#8217;s very likely you&#8217;ll receive a ton of spam complaints&#8230; get shut down by your web host&#8230; earn the reputation of being a spammer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just received an e-mail from Joe Kumar announcing that <b>he&#8217;s selling the names and e-mail addresses of his business contacts</b> to 10 people for $497.  These databases includes ezine owners, Internet marketing &#8220;gurus&#8221;, Volumes 1 &amp; 2 &#8220;30 Day&#8221; ebook contributors, and super affiliates.  (<a href="http://www.joekumar.com/mysuccess.html">Read Joe&#8217;s &#8220;offer&#8221;</a>)</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t speak for the others that <b>helped</b> Joe with his first project, but I know I&#8217;m not too happy about this.  I gave Joe my contact info so *he* can contact me &#8211; not so he can share my info with others without even asking me first.  Geeze, can you imagine if all business owners went out and sold their e-mail address books?  We will never trust anyone with our information again!!</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to contact me, don&#8217;t bother purchasing lists that other people have put together because <b>unless we already have an existing relationship or have previously done business together, messages sent *directly* to my e-mail addies are filtered and sent to the trash</b>.  What you can do is click on the &#8220;help desk&#8221; at the bottom of all my pages and submit the appropriate form.  As long as you&#8217;re not a freak, I&#8217;ll write back as soon as I get a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.marketingchick.com/2003/joe-kumar-selling-e-mail-addies/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
